Historiography Essay Titles
Note: the exam format for 2018 will change. There will be no longer A,B,C sections.
Also, remember that it is a 'seen' exame which means you will receive the exam questions a week in advance.
But you are still welcome to use the questions below for any formative/assessed essay.
Questions on Specific Text/Historian for Essays
- What was the impact of the Enlightenment on History-writing in Europe?
- Would James Mill have written a better history of India if he had known Indian languages?
- Describe historical thinking in colonial era India.
- Assess the significance of style in Ranke鈥檚 historical writing.
- If Ranke 鈥榬ejected Sir Walter Scott鈥�, what was he rejecting?
- Was Leopold von Ranke a Romantic?
- Describe von Ranke鈥檚 鈥業deal of Universal History鈥�. Discuss its relationship to the local and the universal in the historical thinking of EITHER Karl Marx OR Max Weber.
- Describe Iggers鈥� and Wang鈥檚 鈥榟istory of Leopold von Ranke in the world鈥�. Account for any deficiencies in their argument.
- What did Karl Marx mean when he asserted that 鈥榯he social revolution of the nineteenth century can only create its poetry from the future, not from the past鈥�? (Eighteenth Brumaire, Section 1).
- How was The Eighteenth Brumaire revisited on its 150th birthday?
- 鈥榃here Hegel started with philosophy, Marx started with people鈥檚 experiences鈥�. Discuss.
- 鈥楽implicity supplies the key to the secret of the unchangeableness of Asiatic societies鈥� (Marx, Capital, Vol.1, xiv, s. 4). How typical was Marx鈥檚 historiography of India?
- Discuss the 鈥楳arxism鈥� of any twentieth-century historian or theorist of history [state the person clearly in the title].
- Why is Walter Benjamin鈥檚 鈥極n the Concept of History鈥� still regarded as an important text?
- Can Walter Benjamin鈥檚 understanding of History be described as Marxist?
- What is a 'historical fact'?
- What is class consciousness for Marx?
- Was Weber anti-Marx?
- How did Weber approach the problem of causation in history?
- What does Weber understand by rational capitalism and how does it differ from Marx's ideas?
- What does Gramsci mean by hegemony? How does it work?
- 鈥楾he science of men in time鈥� is how Marc Bloch described the practice of history. What did he mean?
- 鈥榃ith their examination of 尘别苍迟补濒颈迟茅 the Annalist historians furnished the historical profession with a new mode of reconstructing the past鈥�. Discuss.
- 鈥業t is undeniable that a science [like the historical science] will always seem to us somehow incomplete if it cannot, sooner or later, in one way or another, aid us to live better鈥�. (Bloch, Historian鈥檚 Craft) Discuss Bloch鈥檚 view of the historical enterprise within society.
- There are many English-language educational and media websites devoted to the work of Annales historians. Make a selection of them, and give an account of the ways in which a twentieth-century 鈥榟istorical school鈥� is presented to twenty-first century reading publics.
- The Making of the English Working Class 鈥榟as come to be seen as the single most influential work of English history of the post-war period鈥� (John Rule, DNB entry for E. P. Thompson). Why?
- Drawing on the resources of advanced options and special subjects, discuss whether or not there is still 鈥榓 Thompsonian legacy鈥� in historical studies.
- Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of micro-history.
- Discuss any historical case-study you have read. Is the case-study approach the same as the micro-historical approach?
- What was cultural about 鈥榯he New Cultural History鈥�?
- Is Foucault's still disturbing for readers today as it was for readers in the 1970s and 1980s?
- What does Foucault mean by biopower?
- Is Foucault still valuable today?
- 鈥楢 challenge to the conventional Western interpretation of the non-Western world鈥�. Is this an adequate description of the impact of Said鈥檚 work on historical scholarship?
- Describe 鈥榯he reception of Edward Said鈥� by historians and others.
- What – if anything – was original about Subaltern Studies?
- To what extent is it possible to hear the voice of the subalter.
- 鈥業t is now men (and masculinity) that are truly hidden from history鈥�. Discuss.
- Discuss the view that Judy Walkowitz鈥檚 City of Dreadful Delight is 鈥榓bout stories, not about history鈥�.
Part B-style general questions
(note: you should answer such questions comparatively, not focusing on just one historian or thinker.)
- Why study historiography?
- What is a 鈥榟istorian鈥�?
- Is history a 鈥榮cience鈥�?
- History is closer to literature than to science.鈥� Discuss.
- Is History primarily about the past or the present?
- What are the implications of E. H. Carr's claim that 鈥榦nly the future can provide the key to the interpretation of the past鈥�?
- Is total or holistic history possible or desirable?
- Describe and discuss the historical enterprise of any one society, past or present, that you have studied during your degree course.
- What counts as a historical source?
- Is there any difference between a historical 鈥榝act鈥� and historical 鈥榚vidence鈥�?
- 鈥楾he idea of what is considered 鈥渧alid historical evidence鈥� has changed considerably over the past two centuries.鈥� Discuss.
- 鈥楾he science of men in time鈥� is how Marc Bloch characterised history. What did he mean? Introduce other historians鈥� conceptions of time in answering this question.
- 鈥楾he writing of history tells us more about the historian than about the past.鈥� Do you agree?鈥�
- 鈥淭ime鈥� has no agreed meaning for historians.鈥� Discuss.
- 鈥楬istory from below invariably romanticises popular culture.鈥� Discuss.
- Is history, as it is written, inevitably relativistic?
- Is it true, as George Orwell claimed, that those with power in the present control the past?
- Has history ended, as Francis Fukuyma claimed?
- Can the writing of history be politically neutral?
- Does political history have a future?
- How and why has cultural history become so important?
- 鈥楳odern history can only be conceived in relationship to the nation state鈥�.鈥� Discuss.
- 鈥楽ince the early nineteenth century, historians have been engaged in a continuing debate with the heritage of the Enlightenment.鈥� Discuss.
- How should history be taught in schools?
- Why should governments fund historical research?
- What is the value of popular history? (You may answer this in terms of television history, film or drama.)
- Why has family history become so popular in modern Britain?
- Why was Marxist theory central to twentieth-century historical scholarship?
- Has the historical writing influenced by Marx been good history?
- To what extent has gender as a category of analysis changed the way historians conceptualise identity and experience?
- 鈥楬istory as a discipline has been and is highly Eurocentric.鈥� Is this true?
- 鈥楶ostcolonialism forces us to re-evaluate the whole history of Britain in modern times.鈥� Discuss.
- How important has the history of the non-Western world been to the shaping of Western historiography?
- Are postmodernist views of history plausible?
- Was postmodernism a serious 鈥榗hallenge to history鈥� in the late twentieth century?
- Has the linguistic turn produced good history writing
- Visucal and material culture is important to history writing. Discuss.
-
Neuroscience can help us to write better history. Discuss.
- Did you think the material and visual turn enrich history writing?
- 'Historians should stick to literary sources. They are the only way to access the past objectively'. Discuss.